The End of Privacy and the Rise of the Attention Economy
by Kristie Conner
Welcome to Media 2.0 and The End of Control. Scary, you bet, especially for all of us control freaks, this statement might just be uncomfortable. It sounds like the title of a Science Fiction novel and it is scary in more than a few ways and just as exciting. If you don’t like change you might want to turn ‘off’ all connections which is okay, but don’t be surprised if you slip into obscurity. Well, that is what Pete Cashmore predicts and in his CNN column. For those of you who do not know Pete Cashmore, he is the founder and CEO of Mashable, a popular blog about social media.
The End of Privacy
He starts the article off by talking about a U.K. firm that is launching a camera (SenseCam)to capture every moment in a person’s life. Imagine capturing e-v-e-r-y moment in your life. I’ll let you think on that for a second. At first thought and second it sounds like a horrible idea. Sure, if you are Brad Pitt or Angelina Jolie, why not. If we have not learned anything from the era of Super-Celebrities, it is that the consumer (us) likes everything the dirt especially when it comes to celebrities. Who picks up a magazine with the headline “Brad and Angie Bake Cookies and Play Scrabble on Friday”. In fact, this love affair has extended to reality shows and ‘airing’ dirty laundry. It has become an American past-time. Now, we have Facebook and Twitter so we can peek into the lives of our network, the more common folk. So, as he says in his column, “you may reel at the privacy implications, I’d wager that the high price of not capturing and sharing every moment of our lives will soon dwarf the cost of our privacy.”
I Agree …
… with Mr. Cashmore. It became very apparent to me that I was ‘not’ going to make the ranks of the elite bloggers and such when I read Tara Hunt’s book and realized I am just not that open, I valued my privacy a bit too much. About six months ago when I was reading her book and read that she took pictures of her hair while at the Salon and sent it around to her network, my reaction was horror. My hair in 100 foils, looking less than human are more like a Media 2.0 character had me uncomfortable. I knew at that point I was lacking. However, fast-forward a few months and I can totally stomach the idea. I started my blog and named it Girls Talking Tech and when I tweet I rarely share personal information. But, what I have learned is that when I do share personal information, I attract more followers. The lesson here is that people can get information. Information is not hard to find, but where they chose to find it will be defined by the ‘who’ and how they feel about the ‘who’.
Unknown and Unemployed
One example, Mr. Cashomore used really got me thinking. You might be brilliant, but if nobody knows, you are likely not cashing in on your talent “Without industry connections or a valuable audience for your work, you aren’t even on the radar.“ How true. He used the example of journalists. It made me think of CNN and how each Rick Sanchez has increased his popularity using social media. As one of the first to adopt and integrate social media into his show, he is now more than just a CNN contributor, he now has his own following and is more of an asset.
In the attention economy, privacy is obscurity … wow! In the digital age, Information was the economy. Now information is readily available to those who have connections (computers, Internet, mobile devices) now it is about who you want to listen to. In his article Pete Cashmore states “those who insert themselves into as many channels as possible look to set to capture the most value.”
I found his column really thought-provoking. Over the next few weeks I am going to spend more time writing about this topic and the ramifications of the Attention Economy. Look for new posts on what this means to small businesses.
Follow on Twitter
















